StockData

Himalaya Shipping vs Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands

HSHP and IMPP side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HSHP and IMPP compare

Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.2% versus 6.7% for Himalaya Shipping).

Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.0% compared with 13.4% at Himalaya Shipping.

Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Himalaya Shipping), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHSHPIMPP
Size and price
Share price$16.24$5.09
Change, 1 year110%−5.2%
Beta (5Y)0.690.77
Employees1,000–
StockData Score
Total score37 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score13 (better)
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.7%9.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–51.3%
Net income growth (TTM)−16.1%−0.36% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−20.8%−7.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin78.8%–
Operating margin51.7% (better)24.8%
Net margin13.4%31.0% (better)
Return on equity11.1% (better)9.7%
Return on invested capital6.4%7.0% (better)
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA6.60–
Interest coverage1.3×17.3× (better)
Current ratio1.194.77 (better)
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio152%–
Years of dividend growth1–
Ownership
Held by institutions48.5%–
Held by insiders29.2%32.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$5.5M–
Short interest, % of float4.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.