StockData

Harrow vs Pharming

HROW and PHAR side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HROW and PHAR compare

Pharming grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.6% versus 21.3% for Harrow).

Pharming keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.76% compared with −9.4% at Harrow.

Pharming scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Harrow), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHROWPHAR
Size and price
Market cap$1.1B–
Share price$28.30$12.95
Change, 1 year−26.9%−18.0%
Change, 5 years162%50.2%
Beta (5Y)1.350.55
Employees37350K
StockData Score
Total score68 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.5×–
P/B36.3×–
FCF yield−1.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)21.3%26.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average41.0% (better)12.1%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−40.8%
Profitability
Gross margin73.5%87.9% (better)
Operating margin−2.0%6.9% (better)
Net margin−9.4%0.76% (better)
FCF margin−6.7%14.3% (better)
Return on equity−74.8%–
Return on invested capital−2.1%–
Financial health
Debt / equity10.03–
Interest coverage−0.3×132× (better)
Current ratio2.292.59 (better)
Altman Z-score1.97–
Piotroski F-score57 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions57.4%0.32%
Held by insiders14.2%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$9.2M–
Short interest, % of float22.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.