StockData

Harrow vs OPKO Health

HROW and OPK side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HROW and OPK compare

Harrow and OPKO Health are about the same size, with market caps of $1.1B and $1.3B.

Harrow grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.3% versus −8.3% for OPKO Health).

Harrow keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −9.4% compared with −29.5% at OPKO Health.

OPKO Health scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Harrow), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHROWOPK
Size and price
Market cap$1.1B$1.3B
Share price$30.12$1.68
Change, 1 year−21.6%27.3%
Change, 5 years179%−61.4%
Beta (5Y)1.370.92
Employees3732,275
StockData Score
Total score68 (better)
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score22
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.7×2.5× (better)
P/B38.7×1.1× (better)
FCF yield−1.8% (better)−10.8%
Fair value–$2.10
Margin of safety–20.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)21.3% (better)−8.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average41.0% (better)−15.8%
Profitability
Gross margin73.5% (better)56.6%
Operating margin−2.0% (better)−17.5%
Net margin−9.4% (better)−29.5%
FCF margin−6.7% (better)−27.0%
Return on equity−74.8%−12.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−2.1% (better)−8.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity10.030.00 (better)
Interest coverage−0.3×–
Current ratio2.294.97 (better)
Altman Z-score2.07 (better)−0.28
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–3.3%
Shareholder yield0.00%3.3% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions57.4%27.2%
Held by insiders14.2%43.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$9.2M−$13.2K (better)
Short interest, % of float22.1%7.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.