StockData

Harrow vs Kamada

HROW and KMDA side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HROW and KMDA compare

Harrow grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.3% versus 13.2% for Kamada).

Harrow scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Kamada), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHROWKMDA
Size and price
Market cap$1.1B–
Share price$30.12$8.09
Change, 1 year−21.6%11.1%
Change, 5 years179%44.5%
Beta (5Y)1.370.76
Employees373393
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.7×–
P/B38.7×–
FCF yield−1.8%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)21.3% (better)13.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average41.0% (better)6.3%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−1.6%
Profitability
Gross margin73.5% (better)40.8%
Operating margin−2.0%14.5% (better)
Net margin−9.4%–
FCF margin−6.7%–
Return on equity−74.8%–
Return on invested capital−2.1%–
Financial health
Debt / equity10.03–
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.54
Interest coverage−0.3×26.8× (better)
Current ratio2.294.06 (better)
Altman Z-score2.07–
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions57.4%8.6%
Held by insiders14.2%45.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$9.2M−$1.7M (better)
Short interest, % of float22.1%0.53%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.