Healthcare Realty Trust vs Nnn Reit
HR and NNN side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HR and NNN compare
Nnn Reit is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Healthcare Realty Trust ($7.9B against $6.2B).
Nnn Reit grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus −5.8% for Healthcare Realty Trust).
Nnn Reit keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.4% compared with −4.0% at Healthcare Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Healthcare Realty Trust yields 5.3% and Nnn Reit 5.9%.
Nnn Reit scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Healthcare Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HR | NNN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.2B | $7.9B |
| Share price | $18.13 | $41.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.1% | −0.27% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.6% | −12.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.48 |
| Employees | 539 | 83 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.1× |
| P/S | 5.5× (better) | 8.3× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.0× |
| PEG | – | 6.53 |
| Fair value | $16.35 | $45.20 |
| Margin of safety | −10.9% | 9.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.8% | 6.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.8% (better) | 7.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −2.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −3.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 62.3% |
| Net margin | −4.0% | 40.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.0% | 8.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 2.8× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.90 | 1.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.3% | 5.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 118% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −1.7% | 2.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.05% (better) | −1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 4.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 110% | 99.4% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$745K (better) | −$1.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- HR stock overview
- HR income statement
- HR valuation and score
- NNN stock overview
- NNN income statement
- NNN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.