StockData

HireQuest vs YYForce

HQI and YFOR side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HQI and YFOR compare

YYForce grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.3% versus −7.5% for HireQuest).

HireQuest keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.1% compared with −37.4% at YYForce.

HireQuest pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; YYForce does not pay one.

HireQuest scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for YYForce), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHQIYFOR
Size and price
Market cap$197M–
Share price$14.16$0.040
Change, 1 year45.2%−100.0%
Change, 5 years−35.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.642.00
Employees75K5
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)5
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score1 (better)0
Valuation
P/E24.8×–
P/S6.5×–
P/B2.9×–
EV/EBITDA16.7×–
Fair value$12.09–
Margin of safety−17.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−7.5%39.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.3%–
Net income growth (TTM)235%–
EPS growth (TTM)217%–
EPS growth, 5Y average2.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin–13.8%
Operating margin28.4% (better)−36.0%
Net margin27.1% (better)−37.4%
FCF margin–−4.1%
Return on equity12.1% (better)−99.1%
Return on invested capital12.0% (better)−57.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.32
Interest coverage65.5× (better)−20.0×
Current ratio2.74 (better)2.11
Altman Z-score6.36–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield1.7%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Shareholder yield1.7%–
Ownership
Held by institutions11.3%3.3%
Held by insiders60.2%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$290K$629K (better)
Short interest, % of float4.0%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.