Helmerich & Payne vs HighPeak Energy
HP and HPK side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HP and HPK compare
Helmerich & Payne is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as HighPeak Energy ($3.8B against $1.0B).
Helmerich & Payne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus −7.1% for HighPeak Energy).
Helmerich & Payne keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.4% compared with −13.8% at HighPeak Energy.
Both pay dividends: Helmerich & Payne yields 2.6% and HighPeak Energy 0.49%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HP | HPK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $1.0B |
| Share price | $38.06 | $8.22 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.0% | 37.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 54.2% | −39.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 6,200 | 50 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | – | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | 3.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.3% | – |
| Fair value | $36.51 | $17.74 |
| Margin of safety | −4.3% | 53.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.6% (better) | −7.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −337% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −642% | −394% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 2.3% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.4% (better) | −13.8% |
| FCF margin | 7.9% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −8.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.78 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.98 | 1.71 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.9× | 1.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.96 (better) | 0.73 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.01 (better) | 0.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.6% (better) | 0.49% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −33.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% (better) | 0.49% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 26.9% |
| Held by insiders | 3.8% | 50.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.5M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | 11.2% |
Go deeper
- HP stock overview
- HP income statement
- HP valuation and score
- HPK stock overview
- HPK income statement
- HPK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.