Hornbeck Offshore Services vs Expro
HOS and XPRO side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HOS and XPRO compare
Expro is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Hornbeck Offshore Services ($1.5B against $874M).
Hornbeck Offshore Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.5% versus −7.1% for Expro).
Expro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.3% compared with −10.6% at Hornbeck Offshore Services.
Expro scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Hornbeck Offshore Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HOS | XPRO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $874M | $1.5B |
| Share price | $5.93 | $13.51 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.8% | −1.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 81.9% | −18.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 1.07 |
| Employees | 2,212 | 8,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 75.1× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 13.6× |
| FCF yield | – | 7.4% |
| Fair value | $11.67 | $10.69 |
| Margin of safety | 49.2% (better) | −26.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 50.5% (better) | −7.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.0% | 18.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −337% | −70.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −71.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 22.4% |
| Operating margin | −8.4% | 3.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.6% | 1.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 7.2% |
| Return on equity | −13.3% | 1.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.0% | 2.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −3.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.00 | 2.05 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.90 | 1.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 4.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 48.4% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.5M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.8% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- HOS stock overview
- HOS income statement
- HOS valuation and score
- XPRO stock overview
- XPRO income statement
- XPRO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.