Hornbeck Offshore Services vs ProPetro
HOS and PUMP side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HOS and PUMP compare
Hornbeck Offshore Services and ProPetro are about the same size, with market caps of $821M and $881M.
Hornbeck Offshore Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.5% versus −6.0% for ProPetro).
ProPetro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.16% compared with −10.6% at Hornbeck Offshore Services.
ProPetro scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Hornbeck Offshore Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HOS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $821M | $881M |
| Share price | $5.57 | $7.17 |
| Change, 1 year | −17.4% | −32.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 70.9% | −7.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 2,212 | 1,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.6× |
| FCF yield | – | −10.9% |
| Fair value | $11.59 | $9.96 |
| Margin of safety | 51.9% (better) | 28.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 50.5% (better) | −6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.0% (better) | 10.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −337% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 23.9% |
| Operating margin | −8.4% | 0.48% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.6% | 0.16% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −7.9% |
| Return on equity | −13.3% | 0.22% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.0% | 0.30% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 (better) | 0.86 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.63 |
| Interest coverage | −3.1× | 0.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.00 | 3.49 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.88 | 1.38 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 120% |
| Held by insiders | 48.0% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$278M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.7% | 15.0% |
Go deeper
- HOS stock overview
- HOS income statement
- HOS valuation and score
- PUMP stock overview
- PUMP income statement
- PUMP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.