Home BancShares vs Renasant
HOMB and RNST side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HOMB and RNST compare
Home BancShares is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Renasant ($6.0B against $3.7B).
On earnings, Renasant is cheaper: it trades at 11.3× trailing earnings, against 12.3× for Home BancShares.
Renasant grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.7% versus 6.1% for Home BancShares).
Home BancShares keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 42.9% compared with 30.3% at Renasant.
Both pay dividends: Home BancShares yields 2.2% and Renasant 2.3%.
Renasant scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 13 for Home BancShares), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HOMB | RNST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.0B | $3.7B |
| Share price | $29.99 | $40.23 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.6% | 15.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 19.4% | 5.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 2,543 | 3,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/S | 5.3× | 3.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.6× | 8.4× (better) |
| PEG | 0.80 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.0% | 11.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $29.90 | $44.01 |
| Margin of safety | −0.31% | 8.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.1% | 25.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.5% (better) | 8.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.0% | 127% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.2% | 79.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.1% (better) | 6.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 42.9% (better) | 30.3% |
| FCF margin | 42.2% (better) | 39.6% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | 8.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.21 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.38 (better) | 0.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 2.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 35.2% | 26.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.7% (better) | 0.23% |
| Buyback yield | 1.8% | 5.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.9% | 90.4% |
| Held by insiders | 5.5% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $107K (better) | −$3.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- HOMB stock overview
- HOMB income statement
- HOMB valuation and score
- RNST stock overview
- RNST income statement
- RNST valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.