StockData

MicroCloud Hologram vs MindForge

HOLO and MF side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HOLO and MF compare

MicroCloud Hologram grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.6% versus −49.9% for MindForge).

MicroCloud Hologram keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −12.4% compared with −223% at MindForge.

MicroCloud Hologram scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for MindForge), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHOLOMF
Size and price
Share price$1.18$18.90
Change, 1 year−67.8%−67.4%
Change, 5 years−100.0%–
Beta (5Y)1.752.98
Employees7415
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)38.6% (better)−49.9%
Profitability
Gross margin21.3% (better)−0.54%
Operating margin0.65% (better)−98.2%
Net margin−12.4% (better)−223%
FCF margin13.9%–
Return on equity−1.8% (better)−167%
Return on invested capital–−140%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−20934.3×
Current ratio34.60 (better)1.14
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.00%
Held by insiders0.00%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.