StockData

MicroCloud Hologram vs Intelligent Protection Management

HOLO and IPM side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HOLO and IPM compare

Intelligent Protection Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (68.4% versus 38.6% for MicroCloud Hologram).

Intelligent Protection Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −11.4% compared with −12.4% at MicroCloud Hologram.

Intelligent Protection Management scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for MicroCloud Hologram), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHOLOIPM
Size and price
Market cap–$15.5M
Share price$1.21$1.72
Change, 1 year−67.0%−13.1%
Change, 5 years−100.0%−55.0%
Beta (5Y)1.750.91
Employees741
StockData Score
Total score710 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score11
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.5×
P/B–1.0×
P/FCF–3.6×
FCF yield–27.6%
Fair value–$5.53
Margin of safety–68.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)38.6%68.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−66.4%
Profitability
Gross margin21.3%40.8% (better)
Operating margin0.65% (better)−13.3%
Net margin−12.4%−11.4% (better)
FCF margin13.9%14.3% (better)
Return on equity−1.8% (better)−20.0%
Return on invested capital–−36.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio34.60 (better)1.20
Altman Z-score–−0.05
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–4.5%
Held by insiders0.00%44.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$146K
Short interest, % of float–0.48%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.