StockData

Hooker Furnishings vs XMax

HOFT and XMAX side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HOFT and XMAX compare

XMax is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Hooker Furnishings ($423M against $156M).

XMax grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (63.5% versus −32.8% for Hooker Furnishings).

XMax keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 186% compared with −8.7% at Hooker Furnishings.

Hooker Furnishings pays a dividend yielding 3.2%; XMax does not pay one.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHOFTXMAX
Size and price
Market cap$156M$423M
Share price$14.56$6.56
Change, 1 year47.1%16.7%
Change, 5 years−44.1%−37.5%
Beta (5Y)0.830.83
Employees84022
StockData Score
Total score1111
Valuation score2 (better)1
Growth score11
Performance score03 (better)
Health score66
Dividend score2 (better)0
Valuation
P/E–15.3×
P/S0.8× (better)26.4×
P/B0.9× (better)4.0×
P/FCF8.3×–
FCF yield12.0%–
Fair value$15.03–
Margin of safety3.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−32.8%63.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−12.4%8.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin38.5% (better)22.9%
Operating margin−6.0% (better)−20.5%
Net margin−8.7%186% (better)
FCF margin9.1%–
Return on equity−9.9%52.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−5.7% (better)−6.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio3.0328.80 (better)
Altman Z-score3.4817.43 (better)
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield3.2%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Dividend growth, 5Y average4.2%–
Buyback yield–−16.5%
Shareholder yield3.2% (better)−16.5%
Ownership
Held by institutions73.3%20.8%
Held by insiders9.2%0.03%
Short interest, % of float1.0%14.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.