Hennessy Advisors vs Value Line
HNNA and VALU side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HNNA and VALU compare
Value Line is the larger company, worth 4.7 times as much as Hennessy Advisors ($380M against $80.2M).
On earnings, Hennessy Advisors is cheaper: it trades at 9.7× trailing earnings, against 19.2× for Value Line.
Value Line grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.5% versus −6.9% for Hennessy Advisors).
Value Line keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 60.3% compared with 24.8% at Hennessy Advisors.
Both pay dividends: Hennessy Advisors yields 5.9% and Value Line 3.4%.
Hennessy Advisors scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 15 for Value Line), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HNNA | VALU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $80.2M | $380M |
| Share price | $10.15 | $40.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.3% | 10.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −7.7% | −6.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.26 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 18 | 106 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.7× (better) | 19.2× |
| P/S | 2.4× (better) | 11.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 3.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.0× (better) | 71.9× |
| P/FCF | 7.9× | – |
| PEG | 0.62 | – |
| FCF yield | 12.7% | – |
| Fair value | $17.52 | $32.20 |
| Margin of safety | 42.1% (better) | −25.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.9% | −5.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.3% (better) | −3.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.3% | −6.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −16.0% | −6.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 33.4% (better) | 10.8% |
| Net margin | 24.8% | 60.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 30.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 8.4% | 18.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 12.4% (better) | 3.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −3.17 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 9.39 (better) | 4.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.02 | 7.20 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.9% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | 53.8% | 62.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.26% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.9% (better) | 3.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.0% | 5.6% |
| Held by insiders | 39.6% | 0.02% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$189K | $6.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.06% | 0.12% |
Go deeper
- HNNA stock overview
- HNNA income statement
- HNNA valuation and score
- VALU stock overview
- VALU income statement
- VALU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.