Hennessy Advisors vs Mount Logan Capital
HNNA and MLCI side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HNNA and MLCI compare
Hennessy Advisors is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Mount Logan Capital ($80.2M against $39.0M).
Hennessy Advisors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.9% versus −24.3% for Mount Logan Capital).
Hennessy Advisors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.8% compared with −155% at Mount Logan Capital.
Both pay dividends: Hennessy Advisors yields 5.9% and Mount Logan Capital 3.4%.
Hennessy Advisors scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 4 for Mount Logan Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HNNA | MLCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $80.2M | $39.0M |
| Share price | $10.15 | $3.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.3% | −56.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −7.7% | −54.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.26 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 18 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.7× | – |
| P/S | 2.4× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.9× | – |
| PEG | 0.62 | – |
| FCF yield | 12.7% | – |
| Fair value | $17.52 | $15.41 |
| Margin of safety | 42.1% | 77.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.9% (better) | −24.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −16.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 33.4% | – |
| Net margin | 24.8% (better) | −155% |
| FCF margin | 30.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 8.4% (better) | −79.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −3.17 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 9.39 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 4.02 (better) | −0.08 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.9% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | 53.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 43.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.9% | 46.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.0% | 22.4% |
| Held by insiders | 39.6% | 8.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$189K | $43.5K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.06% | – |
Go deeper
- HNNA stock overview
- HNNA income statement
- HNNA valuation and score
- MLCI stock overview
- MLCI income statement
- MLCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.