Hongli vs Taylor Devices
HLP and TAYD side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLP and TAYD compare
Hongli grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.0% versus −12.5% for Taylor Devices).
Taylor Devices keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.5% compared with 9.9% at Hongli.
Taylor Devices scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Hongli), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLP | TAYD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $188M |
| Share price | $4.12 | $58.14 |
| Change, 1 year | 141% | 33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 406% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.09 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 176 | 135 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 4.8× |
| P/B | – | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 15.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.5% |
| Fair value | – | $39.50 |
| Margin of safety | – | −47.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 39.0% (better) | −12.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.9% | 13.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −23.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −34.0% | 54.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.5% | 41.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.4% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.9% | 17.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.4% | 31.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.5% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.8% | 19.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.66 | – |
| Interest coverage | 14.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.12 | 8.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 17.53 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −1.0% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −1.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 46.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$897K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.52% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- HLP stock overview
- HLP income statement
- HLP valuation and score
- TAYD stock overview
- TAYD income statement
- TAYD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.