Hamilton Lane vs Ridgepost Capital
HLNE and RPC side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLNE and RPC compare
Hamilton Lane is the larger company, worth 4.9 times as much as Ridgepost Capital ($5.2B against $1.1B).
Hamilton Lane grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus 8.2% for Ridgepost Capital).
Hamilton Lane keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.1% compared with 10.8% at Ridgepost Capital.
Both pay dividends: Hamilton Lane yields 2.4% and Ridgepost Capital 1.6%.
Hamilton Lane scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 10 for Ridgepost Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLNE | RPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.2B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $93.73 | $9.53 |
| Change, 1 year | −30.3% | −6.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.4% | −31.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 785 | 326 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.8× |
| P/S | 6.0× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 5.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1× (better) | 13.1× |
| P/FCF | 14.1× | 10.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.1% | 9.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $96.80 | $12.05 |
| Margin of safety | 3.2% | 20.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.0% (better) | 8.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.3% | 34.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.0% | 129% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 129% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −13.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 27.2% |
| Net margin | 32.1% (better) | 10.8% |
| FCF margin | 42.7% (better) | 29.6% |
| Return on equity | 32.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 4.37 (better) | 1.34 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 32.6% | 48.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 44.2% |
| Held by insiders | 54.9% | 25.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $18.5M (better) | $1.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.0% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- HLNE stock overview
- HLNE income statement
- HLNE valuation and score
- RPC stock overview
- RPC income statement
- RPC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.