Haleon vs Kenvue
HLN and KVUE side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLN and KVUE compare
Kenvue grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.5% versus −1.8% for Haleon).
Haleon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.1% compared with 10.9% at Kenvue.
Kenvue pays a dividend yielding 5.4%; Haleon does not pay one.
Kenvue scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Haleon), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLN | KVUE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $37.1B |
| Share price | $8.66 | $19.31 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.3% | 34.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Employees | – | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 21.9× |
| P/S | – | 2.4× |
| P/B | – | 3.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 15.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.3% |
| Fair value | – | $21.09 |
| Margin of safety | – | 8.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.8% | 3.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.2% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.6% | 17.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 17.8% (better) | 17.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.2% (better) | 58.3% |
| Operating margin | 21.9% (better) | 17.4% |
| Net margin | 15.1% (better) | 10.9% |
| FCF margin | 21.0% (better) | 15.1% |
| Return on equity | 10.2% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.9% | 18.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.50 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.68 | 0.03 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.1× (better) | 6.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.69 | 0.96 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 94.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.7% | 94.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $110M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- HLN stock overview
- HLN income statement
- HLN valuation and score
- KVUE stock overview
- KVUE income statement
- KVUE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.