Hillman Solutions vs Simpson Manufacturing
HLMN and SSD side by side, both in cutlery, handtools, and general hardware. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLMN and SSD compare
Simpson Manufacturing is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Hillman Solutions ($8.1B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Simpson Manufacturing is cheaper: it trades at 21.5× trailing earnings, against 35.9× for Hillman Solutions.
Hillman Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus 5.4% for Simpson Manufacturing).
Simpson Manufacturing keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.6% compared with 2.6% at Hillman Solutions.
Simpson Manufacturing pays a dividend yielding 0.59%; Hillman Solutions does not pay one.
Simpson Manufacturing scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Hillman Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLMN | SSD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $8.1B |
| Share price | $7.90 | $198.77 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.0% | 18.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.5% | 66.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 3,986 | 3,337 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.9× | 21.5× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× (better) | 12.7× |
| P/FCF | 25.2× | 16.4× (better) |
| PEG | – | 10.63 |
| FCF yield | 4.0% | 6.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.69 | $172.62 |
| Margin of safety | 26.1% (better) | −15.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% (better) | 5.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | 13.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 89.5% (better) | 10.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 100% (better) | 12.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 14.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.0% (better) | 45.7% |
| Operating margin | 6.9% | 20.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 15.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.8% | 20.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.4% | 18.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.3% | 22.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.57 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.56 (better) | −0.79 |
| Current ratio | 2.71 | 3.37 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.75 | 7.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.59% |
| Payout ratio | – | 12.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.6% |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% | 2.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.3% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 0.41% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$110K (better) | −$1.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- HLMN stock overview
- HLMN income statement
- HLMN valuation and score
- SSD stock overview
- SSD income statement
- SSD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.