Holley vs Strattec Security
HLLY and STRT side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLLY and STRT compare
Holley is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Strattec Security ($304M against $251M).
On earnings, Strattec Security is cheaper: it trades at 15.1× trailing earnings, against 16.7× for Holley.
Holley grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus −0.73% for Strattec Security).
Holley keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with 2.9% at Strattec Security.
Strattec Security scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Holley), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLLY | STRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $304M | $251M |
| Share price | $2.51 | $62.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −30.1% | −8.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.9% | 45.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 1,407 | 2,654 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.7× | 15.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.7× | 7.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 6.4× (better) | 6.5× |
| PEG | 3.68 | – |
| FCF yield | 15.5% (better) | 15.4% |
| Fair value | $3.31 | $75.15 |
| Margin of safety | 24.3% (better) | 17.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% (better) | −0.73% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −28.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −28.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −20.1% | −3.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.2% (better) | 16.3% |
| Operating margin | 9.7% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net margin | 3.1% (better) | 2.9% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% (better) | 6.8% |
| Return on equity | 4.2% | 7.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% | 10.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.09 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.57 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | 93.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.04 (better) | 3.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.30 | 4.69 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.1% | 91.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 17.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $286K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.1% |
Go deeper
- HLLY stock overview
- HLLY income statement
- HLLY valuation and score
- STRT stock overview
- STRT income statement
- STRT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.