Holley vs Miller Industries
HLLY and MLR side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLLY and MLR compare
Miller Industries is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Holley ($548M against $301M).
On earnings, Holley is cheaper: it trades at 16.5× trailing earnings, against 32.0× for Miller Industries.
Holley grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus −4.2% for Miller Industries).
Holley keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with 2.2% at Miller Industries.
Miller Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Holley does not pay one.
Holley scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Miller Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLLY | MLR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $301M | $548M |
| Share price | $2.48 | $48.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.6% | 26.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.1% | 34.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 1,407 | 1,535 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.5× (better) | 32.0× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 0.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.6× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 6.4× | 5.1× (better) |
| PEG | 3.63 (better) | 8.85 |
| FCF yield | 15.7% | 19.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $3.23 | $28.33 |
| Margin of safety | 23.2% (better) | −70.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% (better) | −4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.0% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −42.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −41.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −20.1% | −5.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.2% (better) | 14.6% |
| Operating margin | 9.7% | – |
| Net margin | 3.1% (better) | 2.2% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.09 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.57 (better) | −1.40 |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.04 (better) | 2.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.29 | 4.30 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 54.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.1% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | – | 2.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $22.8K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- HLLY stock overview
- HLLY income statement
- HLLY valuation and score
- MLR stock overview
- MLR income statement
- MLR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.