Holley vs MasterCraft Boat
HLLY and MCFT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLLY and MCFT compare
MasterCraft Boat is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Holley ($517M against $304M).
On earnings, Holley is cheaper: it trades at 16.7× trailing earnings, against 85.0× for MasterCraft Boat.
MasterCraft Boat grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.8% versus 3.0% for Holley).
Holley keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with 1.6% at MasterCraft Boat.
Holley scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for MasterCraft Boat), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLLY | MCFT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $304M | $517M |
| Share price | $2.51 | $21.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −30.1% | 9.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.9% | −25.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 1,407 | 1,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.7× (better) | 85.0× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.7× (better) | 20.0× |
| P/FCF | 6.4× (better) | 14.7× |
| PEG | 3.68 | – |
| FCF yield | 15.5% (better) | 6.8% |
| Fair value | $3.31 | $7.12 |
| Margin of safety | 24.3% (better) | −198% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% | 50.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.0% (better) | −5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −57.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −74.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −20.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.2% (better) | 22.3% |
| Operating margin | 9.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| Net margin | 3.1% (better) | 1.6% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% | 8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.2% (better) | 2.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% (better) | 2.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.09 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.57 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | 28.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.04 (better) | 1.62 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.30 | 4.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.93% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.93% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.1% | 73.3% |
| Held by insiders | – | 56.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $729K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- HLLY stock overview
- HLLY income statement
- HLLY valuation and score
- MCFT stock overview
- MCFT income statement
- MCFT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.