Houlihan Lokey vs PJT Partners
HLI and PJT side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLI and PJT compare
Houlihan Lokey is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as PJT Partners ($9.6B against $3.8B).
PJT Partners grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.9% versus −0.39% for Houlihan Lokey).
Houlihan Lokey keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.8% compared with 10.6% at PJT Partners.
Both pay dividends: Houlihan Lokey yields 1.9% and PJT Partners 0.67%.
PJT Partners scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 16 for Houlihan Lokey), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLI | PJT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.6B | $3.8B |
| Share price | $138.00 | $149.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −30.4% | −11.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 18.5% | 79.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 2,600 | 1,224 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.1× | – |
| P/S | 3.8× | 2.0× (better) |
| P/B | 4.2× (better) | 12.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.9× | 10.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 24.0× | 5.8× (better) |
| PEG | 1.27 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 17.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $123.78 | $194.69 |
| Margin of safety | −11.5% | 23.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.39% | 22.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 10.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5.4% | 24.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −3.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.3% | – |
| Net margin | 15.8% (better) | 10.6% |
| FCF margin | 15.7% | 35.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 17.7% | 83.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 27.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.40 (better) | 4.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% (better) | 0.67% |
| Payout ratio | 46.4% | 12.6% |
| Buyback yield | 2.5% | 3.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 3.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.7% | 89.2% |
| Held by insiders | 49.4% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$3.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- HLI stock overview
- HLI income statement
- HLI valuation and score
- PJT stock overview
- PJT income statement
- PJT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.