StockData

Herbalife vs Haleon

HLF and HLN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HLF and HLN compare

Herbalife grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.5% versus −1.8% for Haleon).

Haleon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.1% compared with 3.2% at Herbalife.

Herbalife scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Haleon), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHLFHLN
Size and price
Market cap$1.4B–
Share price$13.05$8.66
Change, 1 year62.7%−4.3%
Change, 5 years−69.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.620.15
Employees8,500–
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)9
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score24 (better)
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E8.4×–
P/S0.3×–
EV/EBITDA4.9×–
P/FCF4.2×–
FCF yield23.6%–
Fair value$27.91–
Margin of safety53.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.5% (better)−1.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.9%2.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−49.5%15.6% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−51.1%17.8% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average−4.5%8.3% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin77.7% (better)64.2%
Operating margin9.5%21.9% (better)
Net margin3.2%15.1% (better)
FCF margin6.2%21.0% (better)
Return on equity–10.2%
Return on invested capital32.6% (better)7.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.50
Net debt / EBITDA2.682.68 (better)
Interest coverage2.6×7.1× (better)
Current ratio1.20 (better)0.69
Altman Z-score2.45–
Piotroski F-score67 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.83%–
Shareholder yield0.83%–
Ownership
Held by institutions100%6.7%
Held by insiders3.2%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.4M–
Superinvestors holding12 (better)
Short interest, % of float8.0%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.