StockData

Himax Technologies vs Synaptics

HIMX and SYNA side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HIMX and SYNA compare

Synaptics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus −8.2% for Himax Technologies).

Himax Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with −40.7% at Synaptics.

Himax Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Synaptics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHIMXSYNA
Size and price
Market cap–$4.6B
Share price$9.09$117.86
Change, 1 year14.2%72.8%
Change, 5 years−9.1%−57.7%
Beta (5Y)1.801.99
Employees1,4441,700
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–3.8×
P/B–5.0×
P/FCF–71.1×
FCF yield–1.4%
Fair value–$97.34
Margin of safety–−21.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−8.2%8.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.3% (better)−2.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−44.9%–
EPS growth (TTM)−43.5%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−1.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin30.6%46.0% (better)
Operating margin5.3% (better)−4.7%
Net margin5.3% (better)−40.7%
FCF margin14.4% (better)5.4%
Return on equity4.9% (better)−42.1%
Return on invested capital5.6% (better)−2.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.91 (better)
Interest coverage12.6×–
Current ratio1.58 (better)1.15
Altman Z-score–3.45
Piotroski F-score66
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio148%–
Years of dividend growth1–
Buyback yield–1.9%
Shareholder yield–1.9%
Ownership
Held by institutions11.8%107%
Held by insiders24.5%3.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$8.7M
Short interest, % of float–6.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.