Himax Technologies vs Rambus
HIMX and RMBS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HIMX and RMBS compare
Rambus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.3% versus −8.2% for Himax Technologies).
Rambus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.4% compared with 5.3% at Himax Technologies.
Rambus scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Himax Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HIMX | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $9.1B |
| Share price | $9.09 | $85.36 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.2% | −22.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.1% | 213% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.80 | 1.75 |
| Employees | 1,444 | 791 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 35.1× |
| P/S | – | 11.5× |
| P/B | – | 6.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 29.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 3.4% |
| Fair value | – | $85.65 |
| Margin of safety | – | 0.34% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.2% | 17.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.3% | 23.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −44.9% | 16.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −43.5% | 15.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.6% | 79.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 36.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.3% | 33.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.4% | 39.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.9% | 19.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.6% | 38.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | 12.6× | 245× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.58 | 9.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 41.14 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 148% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.8% | 94.0% |
| Held by insiders | 24.5% | 0.78% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$20.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- HIMX stock overview
- HIMX income statement
- HIMX valuation and score
- RMBS stock overview
- RMBS income statement
- RMBS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.