Highway vs Intelligent Living Application
HIHO and ILAG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HIHO and ILAG compare
Highway grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−35.2% versus −40.1% for Intelligent Living Application).
Highway keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −31.7% compared with −431% at Intelligent Living Application.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HIHO | ILAG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.785 | $1.75 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.9% | −65.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.6% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.14 |
| Employees | 10 | 198 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −35.2% (better) | −40.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −12.1% (better) | −16.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1538% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1750% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.4% (better) | 2.9% |
| Operating margin | −48.0% (better) | −431% |
| Net margin | −31.7% (better) | −431% |
| FCF margin | −31.5% (better) | −54.6% |
| Return on equity | −27.3% (better) | −221% |
| Return on invested capital | −270% | −174% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 0.32 |
| Interest coverage | −2307.0× | −412.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.23 (better) | 1.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 1 | 1 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 1.5% |
| Held by insiders | 45.0% | 69.5% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.47% | 0.67% |
Go deeper
- HIHO stock overview
- HIHO income statement
- HIHO valuation and score
- ILAG stock overview
- ILAG income statement
- ILAG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.