StockData

Harte Hanks vs Stran &

HHS and SWAG side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HHS and SWAG compare

Harte Hanks is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Stran & ($29.9M against $22.0M).

Stran & grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus −7.3% for Harte Hanks).

Stran & keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.1% compared with −3.2% at Harte Hanks.

Stran & scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 3 for Harte Hanks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHHSSWAG
Size and price
Market cap$29.9M$22.0M
Share price$4.01$1.18
Change, 1 year37.3%−64.8%
Change, 5 years−52.1%−72.9%
Beta (5Y)0.710.83
Employees1,719154
StockData Score
Total score316 (better)
Valuation score14 (better)
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score03 (better)
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–16.9×
P/S0.2×0.2× (better)
P/B2.1×0.7× (better)
EV/EBITDA–5.5×
P/FCF–12.1×
FCF yield−32.4%8.3% (better)
Fair value–$1.92
Margin of safety–38.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−7.3%6.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.0%25.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–31.1%
Operating margin−4.6%0.45% (better)
Net margin−3.2%1.1% (better)
FCF margin−6.3%1.5% (better)
Return on equity−29.0%4.3% (better)
Return on invested capital−35.9%2.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.45 (better)0.00
Current ratio1.232.17 (better)
Altman Z-score14.66 (better)3.35
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions29.1%12.8%
Held by insiders39.8%52.6%
Short interest, % of float0.98%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.