Hilton Grand Vacations vs Travel & Leisure
HGV and TNL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HGV and TNL compare
Travel & Leisure is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Hilton Grand Vacations ($4.7B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Hilton Grand Vacations is cheaper: it trades at 8.4× trailing earnings, against 20.9× for Travel & Leisure.
Hilton Grand Vacations grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.8% versus 4.6% for Travel & Leisure).
Hilton Grand Vacations keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 5.7% at Travel & Leisure.
Travel & Leisure pays a dividend yielding 3.0%; Hilton Grand Vacations does not pay one.
Hilton Grand Vacations scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Travel & Leisure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HGV | TNL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $4.7B |
| Share price | $43.92 | $78.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | 21.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.6% | 42.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 22K | 45 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.4× (better) | 20.9× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 2.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.7× (better) | 6.6× |
| P/FCF | 7.0× (better) | 11.4× |
| FCF yield | 14.2% (better) | 8.8% |
| Fair value | $120.01 | $70.50 |
| Margin of safety | 63.4% (better) | −11.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.8% (better) | 4.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 41.4% (better) | 13.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 687% (better) | −42.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 829% (better) | −38.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 92.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 13.0% |
| Net margin | 7.0% (better) | 5.7% |
| FCF margin | 8.0% | 10.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 31.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 2.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.71 | 1.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 63.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.0% |
| Buyback yield | 16.8% (better) | 6.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 16.8% (better) | 9.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 35.4% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.7M (better) | −$28.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 28.4% | 11.1% |
Go deeper
- HGV stock overview
- HGV income statement
- HGV valuation and score
- TNL stock overview
- TNL income statement
- TNL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.