Hilton Grand Vacations vs Target Hospitality
HGV and TH side by side, both in hotels, rooming houses, camps, and other lodging places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HGV and TH compare
Hilton Grand Vacations is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Target Hospitality ($3.4B against $1.2B).
Target Hospitality grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.9% versus 18.8% for Hilton Grand Vacations).
Hilton Grand Vacations keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with −12.2% at Target Hospitality.
Hilton Grand Vacations scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Target Hospitality), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HGV | TH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $45.41 | $11.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.2% | 76.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.8% | 199% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 22K | 902 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.7× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | 2.6× (better) | 3.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.8× (better) | 27.9× |
| P/FCF | 7.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 13.7% | – |
| Fair value | $120.50 | $14.46 |
| Margin of safety | 62.3% (better) | 18.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.8% | 19.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 41.4% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 687% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 829% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 15.7% |
| Operating margin | – | −9.5% |
| Net margin | 7.0% (better) | −12.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 31.0% (better) | −12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −6.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.52 |
| Current ratio | – | 0.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.72 | 1.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 16.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 16.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 50.9% |
| Held by insiders | 35.4% | 20.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.7M (better) | −$201M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 28.4% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- HGV stock overview
- HGV income statement
- HGV valuation and score
- TH stock overview
- TH income statement
- TH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.