HF Foods vs US Foods
HFFG and USFD side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HFFG and USFD compare
US Foods is the larger company, worth 287 times as much as HF Foods ($22.4B against $78.2M).
US Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.8% versus 2.8% for HF Foods).
US Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with −2.8% at HF Foods.
US Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for HF Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HFFG | USFD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $78.2M | $22.4B |
| Share price | $1.45 | $103.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.9% | 41.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.7% | 169% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 949 | 30K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 31.9× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 5.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.75 |
| FCF yield | −4.4% | 4.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.67 | $82.18 |
| Margin of safety | 81.1% (better) | −26.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 3.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.7% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 31.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 38.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 17.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.8% | 3.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.8% | 1.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.28% | 2.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −15.5% | 16.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −8.8% | 10.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.49 (better) | 1.22 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.99 |
| Interest coverage | −2.9× | 4.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.11 | 1.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.24 | 4.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 4.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 16.2% | 109% |
| Held by insiders | 9.1% | 0.82% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $82.6K (better) | −$18.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.40% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- HFFG stock overview
- HFFG income statement
- HFFG valuation and score
- USFD stock overview
- USFD income statement
- USFD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.