Hess Midstream LP vs Mach Natural Resources LP
HESM and MNR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HESM and MNR compare
Hess Midstream LP is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Mach Natural Resources LP ($4.0B against $1.5B).
Mach Natural Resources LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.7% versus −0.60% for Hess Midstream LP).
Hess Midstream LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.5% compared with 10.5% at Mach Natural Resources LP.
Both pay dividends: Hess Midstream LP yields 7.5% and Mach Natural Resources LP 19.9%.
Mach Natural Resources LP scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Hess Midstream LP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HESM | MNR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Share price | $30.95 | $9.03 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.1% | −24.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.6% | −37.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.21 |
| Employees | – | 840 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 10.5× |
| P/S | 2.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5× | 4.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 4.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 22.7% | – |
| Fair value | $30.44 | $15.88 |
| Margin of safety | −1.7% | 43.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.60% | 36.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.2% | 37.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −11.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 62.7% (better) | 17.9% |
| Net margin | 23.5% (better) | 10.5% |
| FCF margin | 56.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.58 | 1.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.25 | 0.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.65 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.5% | 19.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 9.0% | 19.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.3% | 15.5% |
| Held by insiders | – | 64.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$65.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.79% |
Go deeper
- HESM stock overview
- HESM income statement
- HESM valuation and score
- MNR stock overview
- MNR income statement
- MNR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.