D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading vs Wayfair
HEPS and W side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HEPS and W compare
D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus 7.9% for Wayfair).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HEPS | W |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $15.7B |
| Share price | $2.76 | $114.43 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.5% | 1.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.8% | −58.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.07 | 2.75 |
| Employees | 3,611 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 31.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 26.0× |
| FCF yield | – | 3.8% |
| Fair value | – | $47.00 |
| Margin of safety | – | −143% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.4% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 41.0% (better) | −2.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 30.0% |
| Operating margin | −2.4% | 2.1% (better) |
| Net margin | – | −1.2% |
| FCF margin | – | 4.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −9.38 | 2.68 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.89 (better) | 0.67 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.59 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.2% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | – | 15.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$199M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 8.4% |
Go deeper
- HEPS stock overview
- HEPS income statement
- HEPS valuation and score
- W stock overview
- W income statement
- W valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.