Helen of Troy vs SharkNinja
HELE and SN side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HELE and SN compare
SharkNinja grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.7% versus 0.32% for Helen of Troy).
SharkNinja keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.0% compared with −5.4% at Helen of Troy.
SharkNinja scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Helen of Troy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HELE | SN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $673M | – |
| Share price | $28.89 | $208.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.9% | 118% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.7% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 1,854 | 4,143 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× | – |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 4.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 21.9% | – |
| Fair value | $48.57 | – |
| Margin of safety | 40.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.32% | 15.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.2% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 59.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 58.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.4% | 49.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 14.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.4% | 11.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.1% (better) | 7.6% |
| Return on equity | −11.1% | 29.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.1% | 28.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 | 0.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.48 (better) | −0.06 |
| Interest coverage | 0.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.65 | 2.08 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.73 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.25% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.25% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.3% | 65.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 41.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$600M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.2% | 10.8% |
Go deeper
- HELE stock overview
- HELE income statement
- HELE valuation and score
- SN stock overview
- SN income statement
- SN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.