Hawaiian Electric Industries vs Portland General Electric
HE and POR side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HE and POR compare
Portland General Electric is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Hawaiian Electric Industries ($5.4B against $1.5B).
Hawaiian Electric Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.6% versus 1.2% for Portland General Electric).
Portland General Electric pays a dividend yielding 4.7%; Hawaiian Electric Industries does not pay one.
Hawaiian Electric Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Portland General Electric), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HE | POR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $8.62 | $45.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.0% | −9.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.2% | −8.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.29 |
| Employees | 2,203 | 2,877 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.9× (better) | 9.5× |
| FCF yield | −41.0% | −7.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $26.77 | $49.66 |
| Margin of safety | 67.8% (better) | 8.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.6% (better) | 1.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1244% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 1550% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −17.1% | 10.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.5% | 14.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.6% | – |
| FCF margin | −17.4% | −11.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 22.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.32 | 4.52 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.99 | 1.15 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.60 | 0.92 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.8% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.32% | 0.53% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.1% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- HE stock overview
- HE income statement
- HE valuation and score
- POR stock overview
- POR income statement
- POR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.