Hudson Technologies vs Willis Lease Finance
HDSN and WLFC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HDSN and WLFC compare
Willis Lease Finance is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Hudson Technologies ($973M against $185M).
Willis Lease Finance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.3% versus 2.3% for Hudson Technologies).
Willis Lease Finance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with −0.54% at Hudson Technologies.
Willis Lease Finance pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Hudson Technologies does not pay one.
Willis Lease Finance scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Hudson Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HDSN | WLFC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $185M | $973M |
| Share price | $4.40 | $46.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.9% | 13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −7.6% | 256% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 281 | 475 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.5× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 36.3× | 4.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 3.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.04 |
| FCF yield | −17.1% | 25.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $12.25 | $82.90 |
| Margin of safety | 64.1% (better) | 44.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.3% | 17.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | 20.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −106% | −25.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −102% | −28.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 71.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 0.37% | 15.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.54% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −13.0% | 32.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.51% | 13.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.23% | 30.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 3.40 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 3.53 (better) | 0.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 12.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 9.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 9.0% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.1% | 57.7% |
| Held by insiders | 14.1% | 56.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $903K (better) | −$21.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 18.2% |
Go deeper
- HDSN stock overview
- HDSN income statement
- HDSN valuation and score
- WLFC stock overview
- WLFC income statement
- WLFC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.