Hudson Technologies vs Richardson Electronics
HDSN and RELL side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HDSN and RELL compare
Richardson Electronics is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Hudson Technologies ($299M against $188M).
Richardson Electronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.9% versus 2.3% for Hudson Technologies).
Richardson Electronics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −0.54% at Hudson Technologies.
Richardson Electronics pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Hudson Technologies does not pay one.
Richardson Electronics scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Hudson Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HDSN | RELL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $188M | $299M |
| Share price | $4.46 | $20.12 |
| Change, 1 year | −36.2% | 89.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −6.3% | 73.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 281 | 429 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.5× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 36.9× | 18.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 1405× |
| FCF yield | −16.8% | 0.07% (better) |
| Fair value | $12.46 | $14.13 |
| Margin of safety | 64.2% (better) | −42.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.3% | 13.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.8% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −106% | 4748% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −102% | 6500% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.0% | 32.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.37% | 4.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.54% | 3.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −13.0% | 0.09% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.51% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.23% | 6.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 3.40 | 4.65 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.55 | 6.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 40.6% |
| Buyback yield | 8.9% (better) | −1.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.9% (better) | 0.17% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.1% | 67.5% |
| Held by insiders | 14.1% | 29.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $903K (better) | −$4.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 8.3% |
Go deeper
- HDSN stock overview
- HDSN income statement
- HDSN valuation and score
- RELL stock overview
- RELL income statement
- RELL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.