StockData

HUTCHMED (China) vs Zai Lab

HCM and ZLAB side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HCM and ZLAB compare

Zai Lab grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.02% versus −13.0% for HUTCHMED (China)).

HUTCHMED (China) keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 83.3% compared with −44.9% at Zai Lab.

Zai Lab scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for HUTCHMED (China)), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHCMZLAB
Size and price
Market cap–$38.2B
Share price$14.90$24.60
Change, 1 year−2.5%12.4%
Change, 5 years−51.5%−70.8%
Beta (5Y)0.971.10
Employees1091,784
StockData Score
Total score56 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score33
Health score22
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–86.5×
P/B–67.8×
FCF yield–−0.43%
Fair value–$4.31
Margin of safety–−471%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.0%0.02% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.2%56.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)1111%–
EPS growth (TTM)1200%–
Profitability
Gross margin38.7%54.7% (better)
Operating margin−7.1% (better)−63.0%
Net margin83.3% (better)−44.9%
FCF margin−14.4% (better)−37.0%
Return on equity36.7% (better)−30.0%
Return on invested capital–−87.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.09 (better)0.45
Interest coverage−13.7× (better)−45.2×
Current ratio5.64 (better)2.04
Altman Z-score–46.02
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.51%2.8%
Held by insiders0.44%0.67%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$10.8M

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.