StockData

HUTCHMED (China) vs Nuvation Bio

HCM and NUVB side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HCM and NUVB compare

Nuvation Bio grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (654% versus −13.0% for HUTCHMED (China)).

HUTCHMED (China) keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 83.3% compared with −67.4% at Nuvation Bio.

HUTCHMED (China) scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Nuvation Bio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHCMNUVB
Size and price
Market cap–$1.4B
Share price$14.90$3.99
Change, 1 year−2.5%−19.1%
Change, 5 years−51.5%−55.9%
Beta (5Y)0.971.45
Employees109298
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score22
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–6.9×
P/B–6.1×
Fair value–$1.94
Margin of safety–−105%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.0%654% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.2%–
Net income growth (TTM)1111%–
EPS growth (TTM)1200%–
Profitability
Gross margin38.7%–
Operating margin−7.1% (better)−61.2%
Net margin83.3% (better)−67.4%
FCF margin−14.4%–
Return on equity36.7% (better)−49.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.090.03 (better)
Interest coverage−13.7×−5.9× (better)
Current ratio5.647.45 (better)
Altman Z-score–0.06
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.51%66.5%
Held by insiders0.44%24.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$4.5M
Superinvestors holding–2
Short interest, % of float–23.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.