Health Catalyst vs HealthStream
HCAT and HSTM side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HCAT and HSTM compare
HealthStream is the larger company, worth 7.2 times as much as Health Catalyst ($818M against $114M).
HealthStream grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.8% versus −13.9% for Health Catalyst).
HealthStream keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.2% compared with −74.2% at Health Catalyst.
HealthStream pays a dividend yielding 0.49%; Health Catalyst does not pay one.
HealthStream scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 9 for Health Catalyst), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HCAT | HSTM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $114M | $818M |
| Share price | $1.51 | $27.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.6% | 13.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.7% | 10.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.83 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 1,200 | 21 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 40.0× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.1× |
| P/FCF | 4.4× (better) | 11.9× |
| PEG | – | 2.48 |
| FCF yield | 22.6% (better) | 8.4% |
| Fair value | $5.97 | $32.76 |
| Margin of safety | 74.7% (better) | 14.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −13.9% | 9.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −1.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 2.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.1% | 64.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −65.7% | 7.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −74.2% | 6.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.4% | 21.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −84.6% | 5.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −61.4% | 7.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.70 (better) | 1.48 |
| Altman Z-score | −9.02 | 4.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.49% |
| Payout ratio | – | 19.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.4% | 77.9% |
| Held by insiders | 37.8% | 29.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$94.9K (better) | −$6.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 5.8% |
Go deeper
- HCAT stock overview
- HCAT income statement
- HCAT valuation and score
- HSTM stock overview
- HSTM income statement
- HSTM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.