StockData

Harvard Bioscience vs Owlet

HBIO and OWLT side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HBIO and OWLT compare

Owlet is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Harvard Bioscience ($101M against $42.7M).

Owlet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.9% versus 2.3% for Harvard Bioscience).

Owlet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −10.2% compared with −13.2% at Harvard Bioscience.

Owlet scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Harvard Bioscience), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHBIOOWLT
Size and price
Market cap$42.7M$101M
Share price$9.39$3.44
Change, 1 year50.9%−68.7%
Change, 5 years−87.4%−93.9%
Beta (5Y)1.391.77
Employees339108
StockData Score
Total score38 (better)
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score14 (better)
Performance score11
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5× (better)0.9×
P/B8.4×3.8× (better)
FCF yield−7.4%−4.5% (better)
Fair value–$7.31
Margin of safety–52.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.3%13.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−3.3%7.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin57.4% (better)55.7%
Operating margin−1.8% (better)−6.4%
Net margin−13.2%−10.2% (better)
FCF margin−3.5% (better)−4.0%
Return on equity−123%–
Return on invested capital−5.6%–
Financial health
Debt / equity7.280.42 (better)
Interest coverage–−155.2×
Current ratio1.761.91 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.36−2.07 (better)
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions36.9%58.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$202K (better)−$296K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.