Hasbro vs JAKKS Pacific
HAS and JAKK side by side, both in miscellaneous manufacturing industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HAS and JAKK compare
Hasbro is the larger company, worth 47 times as much as JAKKS Pacific ($16.8B against $359M).
On earnings, Hasbro is cheaper: it trades at 17.7× trailing earnings, against 22.4× for JAKKS Pacific.
Hasbro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus −14.7% for JAKKS Pacific).
Hasbro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.6% compared with 2.8% at JAKKS Pacific.
Both pay dividends: Hasbro yields 2.4% and JAKKS Pacific 3.2%.
Hasbro scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for JAKKS Pacific), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HAS | JAKK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.8B | $359M |
| Share price | $119.09 | $31.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 52.8% | 76.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 24.1% | 159% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 1.23 |
| Employees | 4,520 | 652 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.7× (better) | 22.4× |
| P/S | 2.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× (better) | 15.4× |
| P/FCF | 13.7× | 10.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.3% | 9.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $133.86 | $20.09 |
| Margin of safety | 11.0% (better) | −56.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.6% (better) | −14.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.37% (better) | −26.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −58.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −59.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 78.0% (better) | 32.1% |
| Operating margin | 21.9% (better) | 2.6% |
| Net margin | 15.6% (better) | 2.8% |
| FCF margin | 20.1% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | – | 6.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.82 | – |
| Interest coverage | 7.8× | 52.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.40 | 1.72 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.10 (better) | 2.66 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 41.3% | 70.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.58% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% | 3.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.3% | 60.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.64% | 21.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$50.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- HAS stock overview
- HAS income statement
- HAS valuation and score
- JAKK stock overview
- JAKK income statement
- JAKK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.