Hain Celestial vs Vital Farms
HAIN and VITL side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HAIN and VITL compare
Vital Farms is the larger company, worth 31 times as much as Hain Celestial ($389M against $12.7M).
Vital Farms grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus −18.7% for Hain Celestial).
Vital Farms keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.02% compared with −23.7% at Hain Celestial.
Vital Farms scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Hain Celestial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HAIN | VITL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.7M | $389M |
| Share price | $0.140 | $9.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −90.1% | −72.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.7% | −52.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 1,800 | 739 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 0.1× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 37.4× |
| FCF yield | – | −32.4% |
| Fair value | $7.49 | $8.41 |
| Margin of safety | 98.1% (better) | −7.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −18.7% | 16.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −7.2% | 28.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −99.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −104% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 39.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.9% | 28.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −17.0% | 0.04% (better) |
| Net margin | −23.7% | 0.02% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −16.5% |
| Return on equity | −100% | 0.05% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −18.8% | 0.07% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 4.08 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 1.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.29 | 2.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.4% | 85.3% |
| Held by insiders | 2.9% | 39.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$63.1K (better) | −$3.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.0% | 36.9% |
Go deeper
- HAIN stock overview
- HAIN income statement
- HAIN valuation and score
- VITL stock overview
- VITL income statement
- VITL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.