StockData

Hafnia vs Lindblad Expeditions

HAFN and LIND side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HAFN and LIND compare

Lindblad Expeditions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.3% versus −20.5% for Hafnia).

Hafnia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.9% compared with −2.1% at Lindblad Expeditions.

Lindblad Expeditions scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Hafnia), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHAFNLIND
Size and price
Market cap–$2.3B
Share price$9.59$34.55
Change, 1 year49.1%181%
Change, 5 years498%112%
Beta (5Y)0.422.13
Employees4,8001,550
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score04 (better)
Performance score12 (better)
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2.7×
EV/EBITDA–20.6×
P/FCF–20.8×
FCF yield–4.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−20.5%18.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–56.4%
Net income growth (TTM)−56.1%–
EPS growth (TTM)−55.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin41.9%46.6% (better)
Operating margin16.2% (better)7.0%
Net margin14.9% (better)−2.1%
FCF margin20.0% (better)13.1%
Return on invested capital–29.4%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA0.93 (better)2.72
Interest coverage7.4×–
Current ratio1.66 (better)0.84
Altman Z-score–1.47
Piotroski F-score57 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio58.5%–
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–80.3%
Held by insiders45.8%25.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$8.9M (better)−$61.5M
Short interest, % of float1.2%10.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.