Hyatt Hotels vs Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
H and WH side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How H and WH compare
Hyatt Hotels is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Wyndham Hotels & Resorts ($17.0B against $5.6B).
On earnings, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts is cheaper: it trades at 27.5× trailing earnings, against 93.6× for Hyatt Hotels.
Hyatt Hotels grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.8% versus −2.2% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts).
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.7% compared with 2.6% at Hyatt Hotels.
Both pay dividends: Hyatt Hotels yields 0.33% and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 2.3%.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Hyatt Hotels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | H | WH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.0B | $5.6B |
| Share price | $180.57 | $75.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.7% | 2.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 97.3% | −13.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 242K | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 93.6× | 27.5× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× (better) | 3.9× |
| P/B | 5.3× (better) | 11.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.4× | 16.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 92.5× | 17.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | 5.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $64.22 | $51.73 |
| Margin of safety | −181% | −45.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% (better) | −2.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −37.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 30.3% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 14.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.6% | 22.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.6% | 39.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.39 (better) | 5.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.33 (better) | 5.30 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.73 (better) | 1.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 2.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 30.1% | 61.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.6% | 24.0% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | 3.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 50.9% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 70.1% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$122M | −$15.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.4% | 10.4% |
Go deeper
- H stock overview
- H income statement
- H valuation and score
- WH stock overview
- WH income statement
- WH valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.