Hyatt Hotels vs Travel & Leisure
H and TNL side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How H and TNL compare
Hyatt Hotels is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Travel & Leisure ($17.0B against $4.4B).
On earnings, Travel & Leisure is cheaper: it trades at 19.4× trailing earnings, against 93.6× for Hyatt Hotels.
Travel & Leisure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus 2.8% for Hyatt Hotels).
Travel & Leisure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.8% compared with 2.6% at Hyatt Hotels.
Both pay dividends: Hyatt Hotels yields 0.33% and Travel & Leisure 3.3%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | H | TNL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.0B | $4.4B |
| Share price | $180.57 | $71.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.7% | 12.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 97.3% | 20.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 242K | 45 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 93.6× | 19.4× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 5.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.4× | 6.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 92.5× | 9.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | 10.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $64.22 | $64.49 |
| Margin of safety | −181% | −11.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 4.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.0% (better) | 13.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −40.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 92.9% |
| Operating margin | – | 13.7% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 5.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.6% | 10.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.39 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.33 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.73 (better) | 1.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 3.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 30.1% | 62.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.6% | 7.0% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | 6.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 10.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 50.9% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 70.1% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$122M | −$31.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.4% | 12.0% |
Go deeper
- H stock overview
- H income statement
- H valuation and score
- TNL stock overview
- TNL income statement
- TNL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.