Hyatt Hotels vs InterContinental Hotels
H and IHG side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How H and IHG compare
InterContinental Hotels grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.4% versus 2.8% for Hyatt Hotels).
InterContinental Hotels keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.6% compared with 2.6% at Hyatt Hotels.
Hyatt Hotels pays a dividend yielding 0.33%; InterContinental Hotels does not pay one.
InterContinental Hotels scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Hyatt Hotels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | H | IHG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.0B | – |
| Share price | $180.57 | $169.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.7% | 36.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 97.3% | 133% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 242K | 7,459 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 93.6× | – |
| P/S | 2.4× | – |
| P/B | 5.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 92.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | – |
| Fair value | $64.22 | – |
| Margin of safety | −181% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 5.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.0% (better) | 16.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 20.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 26.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 85.3% |
| Operating margin | – | 23.1% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 14.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.6% | 16.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | 594% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.39 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.33 | 2.43 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.73 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | – |
| Payout ratio | 30.1% | 35.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 50.9% | 9.6% |
| Held by insiders | 70.1% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$122M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.4% | – |
Go deeper
- H stock overview
- H income statement
- H valuation and score
- IHG stock overview
- IHG income statement
- IHG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.