GXO Logistics vs XPO
GXO and XPO side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GXO and XPO compare
XPO is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as GXO Logistics ($21.4B against $5.8B).
On earnings, XPO is cheaper: it trades at 43.1× trailing earnings, against 44.5× for GXO Logistics.
XPO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.5% versus 7.6% for GXO Logistics).
XPO keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with 0.96% at GXO Logistics.
XPO scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for GXO Logistics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GXO | XPO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | $21.4B |
| Share price | $50.27 | $183.01 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.9% | 48.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −46.2% | 133% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 1.63 |
| Employees | 154K | 37K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 44.5× | 43.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 10.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× (better) | 17.8× |
| P/FCF | 32.0× (better) | 32.6× |
| FCF yield | 3.1% (better) | 3.1% |
| Fair value | $48.39 | $138.31 |
| Margin of safety | −3.9% (better) | −32.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.6% | 9.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 108% (better) | 51.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 113% (better) | 52.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 24.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 2.4% | 9.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.96% | 5.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.3% | 7.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.4% | 26.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.7% | 13.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.07 (better) | 1.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.05 | 2.02 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 4.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.56 | 3.66 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.31% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.31% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 3.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $304K (better) | −$2.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.6% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- GXO stock overview
- GXO income statement
- GXO valuation and score
- XPO stock overview
- XPO income statement
- XPO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.