StockData

Globavend vs PS International

GVH and PSIG side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GVH and PSIG compare

Globavend grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.5% versus −39.0% for PS International).

Globavend keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with −28.6% at PS International.

Globavend scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 0 for PS International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGVHPSIG
Size and price
Share price$0.820$5.44
Change, 1 year−81.6%37.7%
Beta (5Y)1.020.42
Employees928
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)0
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)42.5% (better)−39.0%
Net income growth (TTM)−49.0%–
EPS growth (TTM)−91.2%–
Profitability
Gross margin10.1% (better)1.9%
Operating margin4.1% (better)−2.9%
Net margin2.9% (better)−28.6%
FCF margin0.98% (better)−10.4%
Return on equity8.5% (better)−441%
Return on invested capital18.6%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage963× (better)−43.6×
Current ratio9.95 (better)0.79
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions1.3%1.8%
Held by insiders7.8%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$4.2K–
Short interest, % of float1.4%2.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.