Greenland Technologies vs Twin Disc
GTEC and TWIN side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GTEC and TWIN compare
Twin Disc is the larger company, worth 27 times as much as Greenland Technologies ($364M against $13.3M).
On earnings, Greenland Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 1.0× trailing earnings, against 11.6× for Twin Disc.
Greenland Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 12.1% for Twin Disc).
Greenland Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.1% compared with 8.0% at Twin Disc.
Twin Disc pays a dividend yielding 0.68%; Greenland Technologies does not pay one.
Twin Disc scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 16 for Greenland Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GTEC | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.3M | $364M |
| Share price | $0.502 | $25.02 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.9% | 51.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.9% | 88.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 15 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 1.0× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 0.1× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | −1.9× | 11.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 14.1× |
| PEG | 0.01 (better) | 0.33 |
| FCF yield | −7.1% | 7.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.52 | $33.73 |
| Margin of safety | 93.3% (better) | 25.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.9% (better) | 12.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −10.7% | 1903% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −51.0% | 1855% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −14.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.7% (better) | 26.9% |
| Operating margin | 17.3% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net margin | 12.1% (better) | 8.0% |
| FCF margin | −0.91% | 6.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.8% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 32.3% (better) | 4.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.18 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.28 | 0.38 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 2.46 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.07 | 3.44 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.68% |
| Payout ratio | 36.7% | 7.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.68% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.7% | 64.6% |
| Held by insiders | 22.7% | 8.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$418K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.60% | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- GTEC stock overview
- GTEC income statement
- GTEC valuation and score
- TWIN stock overview
- TWIN income statement
- TWIN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.